Is Craft intellectually satisfying?

By Sveta

       
   

The philosophy of Liberty is based on the principle of Self-Ownership

>all kinds of socialism cause poverty<

   
   

A page that over and above its political content also shows the world and environment of people who stand for their libertarian ideas.

   
                   

Denk mal nach...

     

 Text deutsch/englisch     Redaktion: Carlo Canvas

     

Think about it...

 
                   
             

mail 

     

Rebellog Departments

 
 

our collection of embeded movies click

Movie of the moment

 

 

 

 

This is a good question. It’s sounds like a simple one and the answer to it shouldn’t be difficult to find, but this is exactly the sort of question, which turns to be tricky, once you give it a serious thought.


The four words “Is Craft intellectually satisfying?” touch actually two different subjects: the subject of a craft and the subject of an intellectual satisfaction. In order to give an answer to the “big” question: how one subject is related to the other, it is necessarily at first to answer many “small” questions.


What is an “intellectual satisfaction”? How to assess it?


I guess it varies from person to person. Everybody looks for different ways to satisfy his or her intellect. Some people need to conquer Nietzsche and read front stories of “Washington Post” before breakfast, while the others are completely content with the latest paperback thriller and sports evening on TV. Comparison between both intellectual levels is not relevant for the “big” question.


What is “Craft”? How to define it in our very diversified world?


At first, born from a need of humans to ease the circumstances of their daily life it went along with a progress of development of a mankind: from clumsy chopped wood sticks to intricate rococo carvings; from rough scraped animal skins to the elaborate pieces of fashion; from clay pots of simple form to fine china; from strings of bear claws to exquisite jewelry. Products of craft and processes of making them were in the center of all economical stages: from objects being made for personal needs to items of natural trade, from manufacture production to industrialism.

 
 

 
 

Not to make things complicated I won’t consider industrial and manufacture mass production qualified for the question of an intellectual satisfaction, were is still enough handmade craft in the world to talk about.

 
There are in a rough outline two groups of handmade products and two groups of people making them.


At first there are the people who reproduce traditional styles, patterns, who repeat the ideas of others and themselves from piece to piece. Does it matter that somebody find it boring? This is not how I interpret the “big” question. The question is: do they find it satisfying for their own intellect? I guess so. They are holding on to their traditions, keeping them alive, maybe learning more and having fun in process. They do it for themselves, they do it for their friends and families, sometimes for sale and may be, considering craft, this is all the intellectual satisfaction they need.


Then there are people who are trying to make their craft special. They do “one of a kind” fine craft pieces. They spend a lot of time with thinking, researching, studying, sketching, trying, experimenting, designing, changing and creating. Are those processes intellectually satisfying? I would say: definitely yes.


What about people who are not involved in craft? Who are just the observers? Just think. In most cases the simple craft pieces, regardless of their quality, represent our first encounter with the foreign and often exotic culture. To see a poorly made bowl in a Chinese restaurant is surely not as much intellectually satisfying as to be able to speak Chinese language, but the red dragon on the bowl tickles your intellect and makes you say: “One day I want go to China”. An oriental carpet is all what the most people get to see of Orient and it could be just a floor covering, or a food for an intellect, if you choose to see it as such and a Russian wooden doll could be a beginning of a life long interest for this country.


Think, that the often broken and damaged craft objects are the only heritage we have got from the long ago disappeared civilizations and how much information they share with us about circumstances and ways of lives of our ancestors. Is subject of antic and historical craft pieces satisfying for intellect? I would say: always.


So, consider many different aspects of craft and many different levels of intellectual satisfaction, under the bottom line, my answer to the question “Is Craft intellectually satisfying?” is: yes, it is, as long as you have an intellect to begin with.

 
 

 

 

 

Studio for Art and Design

Eingang - Entrance

   

 

 

Im Translator, Online translator, spell checker, virtual keyboard, cyrillic decoder

Online Translator.

To stop your Pop-Up-Stopper press "Strg"-Button.

 

 

Political Posters

 

Montages and Caricatures

 

Portraits

 

Filterplay

 

 

„We like it the way it is...“

als PDF - download - German

 

 

My favorites:

 

 Ali, Ayaan Hirsi
Aliberti, Lucia
Barenboim, Daniel
Benanteur, Dahmane
Berger, Erna
Berliner Philharmoniker
Björling, Björling
Bläser der Berliner Philharmoniker
Bravo, Manuel A.
Broder, Henryk M.
Bunny, Rupert W.
Fallaci, Oriana
Friedman, David
Galitsin, Gregori
Giebel, Agnes
Gigli, Benjamino
Hopper, Edward
Johaentges, Karl
Kästner, Erich
Koelbl, Herlinde
Lebeck, Robert
Lenau, Nikolaus
Leonhard, Wolfgang
Michener, James A.
Müller, Wilhelm
Nakic, Adrian
Newton, Helmut
Rand, Ayn,
Richter, Karl
Richter, Svjatoslav
Rozhdestvensky, G.
Saarinen, Pekka
Schneiderhahn, W.
Serebryakova, Sinaida
Snow, Aurora
Traven, B.
Wunderlich, Fritz

enter

 

My favorite assholes

enter

 

 

   

 

   
       

 

       
       

         
                   
       

All articles and links, not written by rebellog,  are quotations. The articles and links we present in these pages we found at the time to be interesting. As a matter of principle, we cannot accept any restrictions to links with pages of dubious content. Judgement is left to the responsibility of the visitor. 

         
                   

 

     

Best view with 1280 x 1024

     

 

 
       

home | headquarter | news | bio | help | links | banner | guests | mail | impressum | copyright

Rebellog-Fullindex

 

Editor:  Robin Renitent   Graphic content designed by rebellog:  Berthold Byte   

© 2006 rebellog

 

 

 

         
       

         

rebellog stands for:


Libertarianism – Anarchism - Anarchistic-Capitalism - Self-Governance - Individualism - Free-Trade - Global Competition - Right to Self-Defence – Cosmopolitanism - Freedom of Expression - Self-Determination – Optimism - Environmental Stewardship - Gender Equality – Liberty - Independent Thinking - Right to Bear Arms - Critical Thinking - Right to Refuse Taxation - Right to Notaxable Income - Friendship with America and Israel - Right to Abortion-Pornography - Prostitution - Mild Stimulants
 

rebellog rejects:


Conservativism-Social - Democratism-Liberalism - Socialism-Collectivism - Government Control - Collectivism-Majority Rule - Protectionism -Tarifs – Duties - Wealth Redistribution – Nationalism – Censorship - Extreme Social Programs - Passivism-Nihilism - Environmental Fanaticism - Feminism – Quotas - Peace Activism - Fad Activism - Arms Control - Intellactual Submissivness - Compulsive Government Taxation - Unions -Government Employment Regulation - Anti-Americanism - Anti-Semitism - Government Privacy Invasion

 
       

 

       
       

         
 
Open links in secondary window